<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Investigative Genetics - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.investigativegenetics.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Investigative Genetics</description>
        <dc:date>2013-05-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/1" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/9">
        <title>Clinal distribution of human genomic diversity across the Netherlands despite archaeological evidence for genetic discontinuities in Dutch population history</title>
        <description>Background:
The presence of a southeast to northwest gradient across Europe in human genetic diversity is a well-established observation and has recently been confirmed by genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. This pattern is traditionally explained by major prehistoric human migration events in Palaeolithic and Neolithic times. Here, we investigate whether (similar) spatial patterns in human genomic diversity also occur on a micro-geographic scale within Europe, such as in the Netherlands, and if so, whether these patterns could also be explained by more recent demographic events, such as those that occurred in Dutch population history.
Methods:
We newly collected data on a total of 999 Dutch individuals sampled at 54 sites across the country at 443,816 autosomal SNPs using the Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 5.0 (Affymetrix). We studied the individual genetic relationships by means of classical multidimensional scaling (MDS) using different genetic distance matrices, spatial ancestry analysis (SPA), and ADMIXTURE software. We further performed dedicated analyses to search for spatial patterns in the genomic variation and conducted simulations (SPLATCHE2) to provide a historical interpretation of the observed spatial patterns.
Results:
We detected a subtle but clearly noticeable genomic population substructure in the Dutch population, allowing differentiation of a north-eastern, central-western, central-northern and a southern group. Furthermore, we observed a statistically significant southeast to northwest cline in the distribution of genomic diversity across the Netherlands, similar to earlier findings from across Europe. Simulation analyses indicate that this genomic gradient could similarly be caused by ancient as well as by the more recent events in Dutch history.
Conclusions:
Considering the strong archaeological evidence for genetic discontinuity in the Netherlands, we interpret the observed clinal pattern of genomic diversity as being caused by recent rather than ancient events in Dutch population history. We therefore suggest that future human population genetic studies pay more attention to recent demographic history in interpreting genetic clines. Furthermore, our study demonstrates that genetic population substructure is detectable on a small geographic scale in Europe despite recent demographic events, a finding we consider potentially relevant for future epidemiological and forensic studies.</description>
        <link>http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Oscar Lao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eveline Altena</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christian Becker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Silke Brauer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thirsa Kraaijenbrink</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mannis van Oven</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Nürnberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter de Knijff</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manfred Kayser</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Investigative Genetics 2013, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-2223-4-9</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>New perspectives on genomic diversity</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Manfred Kayser and colleagues propose that some of the genetic variation we see across human populations may occur due to demographic events in recent history rather than ancient history.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/2041-2223-4-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Investigative Genetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-2223</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/10">
        <title>Major historical dietary changes are reflected in the dental microbiome of ancient skeletons</title>
        <description>The post-industrial lifestyle has many disadvantageous effects on our health. One of the factors is modern nutrition, which has been associated with epidemic burdens, such as obesity and cardiovascular diseases. At least two major shifts have occurred in the nutritional history of humans: the use of carbohydrate-rich diets which were adopted around 10,000 years BP due to Neolithic farming, and later the influence of industrially processed flour and white sugar after the industrial revolution in the 1850s. In a recent paper in Nature Genetics Adler et al. used a novel approach to see how these dietary changes affected the oral microbiome by analyzing the ancient microbial DNA in the calcified dental plaque from 34 early European skeletons.</description>
        <link>http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Antti Sajantila</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Investigative Genetics 2013, null:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-2223-4-10</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2041-2223-4-10-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Investigative Genetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-2223</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/8">
        <title>Purification of crime scene DNA extracts using centrifugal filter devices</title>
        <description>Background:
The success of forensic DNA analysis is limited by the size, quality and purity of biological evidence found at crime scenes. Sample impurities can inhibit PCR, resulting in partial or negative DNA profiles. Various DNA purification methods are applied to remove impurities, for example, employing centrifugal filter devices. However, irrespective of method, DNA purification leads to DNA loss. Here we evaluate the filter devices Amicon Ultra 30 K and Microsep 30 K with respect to recovery rate and general performance for various types of PCR-inhibitory crime scene samples.
Methods:
Recovery rates for DNA purification using Amicon Ultra 30 K and Microsep 30 K were gathered using quantitative PCR. Mock crime scene DNA extracts were analyzed using quantitative PCR and short tandem repeat (STR) profiling to test the general performance and inhibitor-removal properties of the two filter devices. Additionally, the outcome of long-term routine casework DNA analysis applying each of the devices was evaluated.
Results:
Applying Microsep 30 K, 14 to 32% of the input DNA was recovered, whereas Amicon Ultra 30 K retained 62 to 70% of the DNA. The improved purity following filter purification counteracted some of this DNA loss, leading to slightly increased electropherogram peak heights for blood on denim (Amicon Ultra 30 K and Microsep 30 K) and saliva on envelope (Amicon Ultra 30 K). Comparing Amicon Ultra 30 K and Microsep 30 K for purification of DNA extracts from mock crime scene samples, the former generated significantly higher peak heights for rape case samples (P-values &lt;0.01) and for hairs (P-values &lt;0.036). In long-term routine use of the two filter devices, DNA extracts purified with Amicon Ultra 30 K were considerably less PCR-inhibitory in Quantifiler Human qPCR analysis compared to Microsep 30 K.
Conclusions:
Amicon Ultra 30 K performed better than Microsep 30 K due to higher DNA recovery and more efficient removal of PCR-inhibitory substances. The different performances of the filter devices are likely caused by the quality of the filters and plastic wares, for example, their DNA binding properties. DNA purification using centrifugal filter devices can be necessary for successful DNA profiling of impure crime scene samples and for consistency between different PCR-based analysis systems, such as quantification and STR analysis. In order to maximize the possibility to obtain complete STR DNA profiles and to create an efficient workflow, the level of DNA purification applied should be correlated to the inhibitor-tolerance of the STR analysis system used.</description>
        <link>http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Lina Norén</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ronny Hedell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ricky Ansell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Johannes Hedman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Investigative Genetics 2013, null:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-2223-4-8</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2041-2223-4-8-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Investigative Genetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-2223</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/7">
        <title>Long-term RNA persistence in postmortem contexts</title>
        <description>Ribonucleic acids (RNA) are generally considered fragile molecules that are readily degraded. However, there is growing documentation of long-term (from days to centuries) RNA persistence in a variety of contexts and tissue types, and as such a number of academic disciplines are beginning to exploit degraded RNA. While the reasons for its survival are not fully understood, there are several plausible mechanisms that would safeguard this molecule against degradation. However, after examining the literature available on the postmortem instability and decay mechanisms of RNA, it has become clear that limited experimental studies and no reviews offer an overview of these mechanisms. Hence in this review we outline molecular reasons for RNA surviving long-term postmortem, and provide specific examples of RNA survival in forensic, archival and archaeological contexts. A better understanding of the mechanisms of RNA decay will be crucial for developing expectations on its long-term survival.</description>
        <link>http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Fordyce</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marie-Louise Kampmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nienke van Doorn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>M Gilbert</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Investigative Genetics 2013, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-2223-4-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2041-2223-4-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Investigative Genetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-2223</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/6">
        <title>Where is the game? Wild meat products authentication in South Africa: a case study</title>
        <description>Background:
Wild animals&#8217; meat is extensively consumed in South Africa, being obtained either from ranching, farming or hunting. To test the authenticity of the commercial labels of meat products in the local market, we obtained DNA sequence information from 146 samples (14 beef and 132 game labels) for barcoding cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and partial cytochrome b and mitochondrial fragments. The reliability of species assignments were evaluated using BLAST searches in GenBank, maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis and the character-based method implemented in BLOG. The Kimura-2-parameter intra- and interspecific variation was evaluated for all matched species.
Results:
The combined application of similarity, phylogenetic and character-based methods proved successful in species identification. Game meat samples showed 76.5% substitution, no beef samples were substituted. The substitutions showed a variety of domestic species (cattle, horse, pig, lamb), common game species in the market (kudu, gemsbok, ostrich, impala, springbok), uncommon species in the market (giraffe, waterbuck, bushbuck, duiker, mountain zebra) and extra-continental species (kangaroo). The mountain zebra Equus zebra is an International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) red listed species. We also detected Damaliscus pygargus, which is composed of two subspecies with one listed by IUCN as &#8216;near threatened&#8217;; however, these mitochondrial fragments were insufficient to distinguish between the subspecies. The genetic distance between African ungulate species often overlaps with within-species distance in cases of recent speciation events, and strong phylogeographic structure determines within-species distances that are similar to the commonly accepted distances between species.
Conclusions:
The reliability of commercial labeling of game meat in South Africa is very poor. The extensive substitution of wild game has important implications for conservation and commerce, and for the consumers making decisions on the basis of health, religious beliefs or personal choices.Distance would be a poor indicator for identification of African ungulates species. The efficiency of the character-based method is reliant upon availability of large reference data. The current higher availability of cytochrome b data would make this the marker of choice for African ungulates. The encountered problems of incomplete or erroneous information in databases are discussed.</description>
        <link>http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Maria Eugenia D¿Amato</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Evguenia Alechine</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kevin Wesley Cloete</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sean Davison</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Corach</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Investigative Genetics 2013, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-2223-4-6</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Whats the beef?</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;As the worldwide meat scandal continues, this new research reports that almost 80% of 146 South African meat samples were incorrectly labelled using mitochondrial COI DNA barcoding and cyt b sequencing.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/2041-2223-4-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Investigative Genetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-2223</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-03-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/5">
        <title>Flogging a dead horse</title>
        <description>n/a</description>
        <link>http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Mark Jobling</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Investigative Genetics 2013, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-02-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-2223-4-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2041-2223-4-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Investigative Genetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-2223</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-02-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/4">
        <title>ENCODE and its first impractical application</title>
        <description>n/a</description>
        <link>http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Bruce Budowle</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Investigative Genetics 2013, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-01-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-2223-4-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2041-2223-4-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Investigative Genetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-2223</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-01-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/3">
        <title>Bona fide colour: DNA prediction of human eye and hair colour from ancient and contemporary skeletal remains</title>
        <description>Background:
DNA analysis of ancient skeletal remains is invaluable in evolutionary biology for exploring the history of species, including humans. Contemporary human bones and teeth, however, are relevant in forensic DNA analyses that deal with the identification of perpetrators, missing persons, disaster victims or family relationships. They may also provide useful information towards unravelling controversies that surround famous historical individuals. Retrieving information about a deceased person&#8217;s externally visible characteristics can be informative in both types of DNA analyses. Recently, we demonstrated that human eye and hair colour can be reliably predicted from DNA using the HIrisPlex system. Here we test the feasibility of the novel HIrisPlex system at establishing eye and hair colour of deceased individuals from skeletal remains of various post-mortem time ranges and storage conditions.
Methods:
Twenty-one teeth between 1 and approximately 800 years of age and 5 contemporary bones were subjected to DNA extraction using standard organic protocol followed by analysis using the HIrisPlex system.
Results:
Twenty-three out of 26 bone DNA extracts yielded the full 24 SNP HIrisPlex profile, therefore successfully allowing model-based eye and hair colour prediction. HIrisPlex analysis of a tooth from the Polish general W&#322;adys&#322;aw Sikorski (1881 to 1943) revealed blue eye colour and blond hair colour, which was positively verified from reliable documentation. The partial profiles collected in the remaining three cases (two contemporary samples and a 14th century sample) were sufficient for eye colour prediction.
Conclusions:
Overall, we demonstrate that the HIrisPlex system is suitable, sufficiently sensitive and robust to successfully predict eye and hair colour from ancient and contemporary skeletal remains. Our findings, therefore, highlight the HIrisPlex system as a promising tool in future routine forensic casework involving skeletal remains, including ancient DNA studies, for the prediction of eye and hair colour of deceased individuals.</description>
        <link>http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Jolanta Draus-Barini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Walsh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ewelina Po¿piech</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tomasz Kupiec</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Henryk G¿¿b</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wojciech Branicki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manfred Kayser</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Investigative Genetics 2013, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-01-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-2223-4-3</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Finding new information from old bones</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Externally visible human features can be predicted from 800-year old bones. A novel technique is reported to predict hair and eye colour from just skeletal remains.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/2041-2223-4-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Investigative Genetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-2223</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-01-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/2">
        <title>Comment on Kokshoorn, B, and Blankers, BJ &amp;#8216;Response to Grisedale, KS and van Daal, A: comparison of STR profiling from low template DNA extracts with and without the consensus profiling method&amp;#8217;</title>
        <description>Kokshoorn and Blankers responded to our recent article by saying that replicate analysis and consensus profiling of low template samples was best in terms of reliability and objectivity. We agree that the consensus approach has benefits, particularly in eliminating non-repeating spurious alleles from the final profile. However, with the development of statistical models that can accommodate stochastic effects and allele drop in, it may be beneficial to perform a single amplification with three times the amount of template, since much information is lost from the profile using the consensus approach.Please see related article:http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/1</description>
        <link>http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Kelly Grisedale</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Angela Daal</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Investigative Genetics 2013, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-01-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-2223-4-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2041-2223-4-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Investigative Genetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-2223</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-01-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/1">
        <title>Response to Grisedale and Van Daal: comparison of STR profiling from low template DNA extracts with and without the consensus profiling method</title>
        <description>In a recent contribution to this journal Grisedale and Van Daal concluded that a single STR analysis of all available template DNA is to be preferred over replicate analyses and a consensus approach when analyzing low template DNA samples. A single STR analysis approach does not allow for an assessment of the validity of the resulting DNA profile. We argue that the use of replicate amplifications is the best way to objectively quantify the extent of the stochastic variation in the data. By applying consensus methodology and/or a probabilistic model, the interpretation of the data will therefore be more objective and reliable.Please see related article: http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/3/1/14</description>
        <link>http://www.investigativegenetics.com/content/4/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Bas Kokshoorn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bart Blankers</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Investigative Genetics 2013, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-01-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-2223-4-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/2041-2223-4-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Investigative Genetics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-2223</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-01-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
